Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): Turkish Journal of Marketing
Articles

Investigating the effects of factors that influence the attitudes of consumers towards private label products on their repurchase intention: A study on personal care products

PDF (Türkçe)
  • Selin Pektaş,
  • Buket Bora Semiz
Selin Pektaş
Scientist, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University
Buket Bora Semiz
Asst. Prof. Dr., Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30685/tujom.v6i1.112

Published 04/25/2021

Keywords

  • Özel Markalı Ürünler, Kişisel Bakım Ürünleri, Fiyat-Kalite Algısı, Fiyat Bilinci, Değer Bilinci.
  • Private Label Products, Personal Care Products, Price-Quality Perception, Price Consciousness, Value Consciousness

How to Cite

Pektaş, S., & Semiz, B. B. (2021). Investigating the effects of factors that influence the attitudes of consumers towards private label products on their repurchase intention: A study on personal care products. Turkish Journal of Marketing, 6(1), 32–50. https://doi.org/10.30685/tujom.v6i1.112

Copyright (c) 2021 Selin Pektaş- Buket Bora Semiz

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The study aims to examine the effects of factors that have been reported in the literature to influence attitudes towards private label products on repurchase intention. A quantitative method has been adopted in the research. The study data were collected from 610 participants by a survey between 27 May and 11 June 2020 by using the method of convenience sampling. The study sample consisted of consumers who preferred private label products in their care product shopping at personal care stores in Bilecik. When the study's findings are examined in the context of the private label personal care product repurchase behaviours of the participants, they provide information on purchasing frequency, awareness status, price-quality perception, package reading knowledge and types of most frequently purchased products. The most frequently purchased private label personal care products were determined as tissues, toothbrushes and wet wipes. According to another result of the study, the value consciousness and price-quality perception positively affect intentions to repurchase private label personal care products; and the perceived risk hurts intentions to repurchase private label personal care products.

PDF (Türkçe)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Agharzayev, E., & Bakir, N. O. (2021). Özel Markalarda Algılanan Risk Boyutlarının Satın Alma Niyetine Etkisi: Özel Marka İmajının Aracılık Rolü. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 19(39), 115-261.
  2. Anderson, A. H. (2002). A & P: The Story of The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company. Arcadia Publishing.
  3. Arslan, Y. (2012). Tüketicilerin Özel Markalı Ürünlere Yönelik Tutumları ve Bu Tutumlara Etki Eden Faktörlerin İncelenmesi. Sakarya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Sakarya.
  4. Arslan, B. (2015). Türkiye’de İkamet Eden Tüketicilerin Özel Markalı Ürünlere Yönelik Tutumlarına Etki Eden Faktörler. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(55), 125-138.
  5. Ashley, S. R. (1998), How To Effectively Compete Aganist Private-Label Brands, Journal of Advertising Research, 38 (1), 75-83.
  6. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
  7. Bardakçı, A., Sarıtaş, H., & Gözlükaya, Ö. G. İ. (2003). Özel Marka Tercihinin Satınalma riskleri açısından değerlendirilmesi. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (21).
  8. Başfırıncı, Ç., Ük, Zuhal. Ç., & Gültekin, Y. (2019). Türkiye'deki indirim marketlerinin marka imajlarının sosyal ağ analizi yöntemiyle incelenmesi: A101, BİM ve ŞOK örneği. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi, 5(2), 277-300.
  9. Batra, R. & Sinha, I. (2000). Consumer-Level Factors Moderating the Success of Private Label Brands. Journal of Retailing, 76 (2), 175-180.
  10. Bao, Y., Bao, Y., & Sheng, S. (2011). Motivating purchase of private brands: Effects of store image, product signatureness, and quality variation. Journal of Business Research, 64(2), 220-226.
  11. Bayram, N. (2010). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş AMOS Uygulamaları. Ezgi Kitabevi.
  12. Bloemer, J. M. M., & Kasper, H. D. P. (1995). The complex relationship between consumer satisfaction and brand loyalty. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16, 311-329.
  13. Burton, S., Lichtenstein, D. R., Netemeyer, R. G., & Garretson, J. A. (1998). A scale for measuring attitude toward private label products and an examination of its psychological and behavioral correlates. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 26(4), 293-306.
  14. Cho, M., Bonn, M. A., & Kang, S. (2014). Wine attributes, perceived risk and online wine repurchase intention: The cross-level interaction effects of website quality. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 43, 108-120.
  15. Compeau, D. R. ve Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure Initial Test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2): 189-211.
  16. Curtis, T. (2009). Customer satisfaction, loyalty and repurchase: Meta-analytical review, and theoretical and empirical evidence of loyalty and repurchase differences. PhD Thesis, Nova Southeastern University, Florida.
  17. Diallo, M. F. (2012). Effects of store image and store brand price-image on store brand purchase intention: Application to an emerging market. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(3), 360-367.
  18. Erdil, T. S. (2015). Effects of customer brand perceptions on store image and purchase intention: An application in apparel clothing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 196-205.
  19. Fornell C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res, 18(1), 39–50.
  20. Garretson, J., Dan, F. & Burton, S. (2002). Antecedents of Private Label Attitude and National Brand Promotion Attitude: Similarities and Differences. Journal of Retailing, 78, 91-99.
  21. Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the association for information systems, 4(1), 7.
  22. Guerrero, L., Colomer, Y., Guàrdia, M. D., Xicola, J., & Clotet, R. (2000). Consumer attitude towards store brands. Food quality and preference, 11(5), 387-395.
  23. Hellier, P. K., Geursen, G. M., Carr, R. A., & Rickard, J. A. (2003). Customer repurchase intention: A general structural equation model. European Journal of Marketing, 37(11/12), 1762-1800.
  24. https://www.ekonomist.com.tr/arastirmalar/pandemi-private-label-pazarini-hizli-buyutecek.html, Erişim Tarihi: 02.02.2021.
  25. https://plturkey.org/pl-almanak-2020/mobile/index.html#p=(?), Erişim Tarihi: 25.03.2021.
  26. Hoch, S. & Banerji S. (1993). When Do Private Labels Succeed. Sloan Management Review, 34(4), 57-67.
  27. Hume, M., Mort, G. S., & Winzar, H. (2007). Exploring repurchase intention in a performing arts context: Who comes? And why do they come back? International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 12(2), 135-148.
  28. Jacoby, J. & Mazursky, D. (1984). Linking brand and retailer images: Do the potential risks outweigh the potential benefits? Journal of Retailing, 60(2), 105–122.
  29. Jin, B. & Suh, Y. G. (2005). Integrating effect of consumer perception factors in predicting private brand purchase in a Korean discount store context. Journal of consumer marketing, 22 (2), 62-71.
  30. Kasapoğlu, K. (2019). Market Markalı Ürünlerin Pazarlanmasında Pazarlama İletişiminin Önemi Ve Bir Araştırma. Maltepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul.
  31. Kuhar, A., & Tič, T. (2008). Attitudes towards private labels-example of a consumer sensory evaluation of food in Slovenia. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, 91(2), 379-390.
  32. Lichtenstein, D., Ridgway, N. & Netemeyer, R. (1993). Price Perceptions and Consumer Shopping Behavior: A Field Study. Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (2), 234-245.
  33. Liu, T. C., & Wang, C. Y. (2008). Factors affecting attitudes toward private labels and promoted brands. Journal of Marketing Management, 24(3-4), 283-298.
  34. Marshall, D. Lin, C. Y., Dawson, J. (2009). Consumer Attitudes Towards a European Retailer’ s Private Brand Foof Products: An Integrated Model of Taiwanese Consumers. Journal of Marketing Management, 25(9-10), 875-891.
  35. Martineau, P. (1958). The personality of the retail store. Harvard Business Review, 36 (1), 47-55.
  36. Mitchell, V. W. (1999). Consumer perceived risk: conceptualisations and models. European Journal of Marketing, 33(1/2), 163-195.
  37. Nielsen (2019). Özel Markalı Ürünler Hakkında Çalışmalar. Erişim Tarihi: 10.12.2019. https://www.nielsen.com/tr/tr/insights/article/2018/trends-in-rapid-consumption-have-changed/.
  38. Orel Demirci, Fatma, (2006), “Özel Markalara Farklı Düzeyde Eğilimi Olan Tüketiciler Arasındaki Sosyo-Demografik ve Tutumsal Farklılıklar”, Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7 (26), 37-62.
  39. Pandya, A. R., & Joshi, M. A. (2011). A Comparative Study on Consumers' Attitude Towards Private Labels: A Focus on Gujarat. IUP Journal of Marketing Management, 10(1).
  40. Parasuraman, P., Zeithaml, V.& Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-Qual: A Multiple- Item Scalw for Assessing Electronic Service Quality, Journal of Service Research, 7 (3), 213-233.
  41. Porral, C. C., & Lang, M. F. (2015). Private labels: The role of manufacturer identification, brand loyalty and image on purchase intention. British Food Journal, 117 (2), 506-522.
  42. Schiffman, G. L. & Kanuk, L. L. (2010). Consumer behavior (10th Ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  43. Sethuraman, R. & Cole, C. (1999). Factors Influencing The Price Premiums That Consumers Pay for National Brands over Store Brands. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 8(4), 340-351.
  44. Shirai, M. (2015). Impact of “High Quality, Low Price” Appeal on Consumer Evaluations. Journal of Promotion Management, 21(6), 776-797.
  45. Tamilia, R., Corriveau, G. &Arguedas, L. (2002). Understanding the Significance of Private Brands with Particular Reference to the Canadian Grocery Market. Business Strategy Department, University of Quebec in Montreal, Working Paper 11, Canada.
  46. Taylor, J. W. (1974). The role of risk in consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing, 38(2), 53-60.
  47. Tho, N. X., Lai, M. T., & Yan, H. (2017). The Effect of Perceived Risk on Repurchase Intention and Word–of–Mouth in the Mobile Telecommunication Market: A Case Study from Vietnam. International Business Research, 10(3), 8-19.
  48. Zhang, L., Tan, W., Xu, Y., & Tan, G. (2012). Demension of consumers’ perceived risk and their influences on online consumer’s purchase behavior. Communications in information science and management engineering (CISME), 2(7), 8-14.
  49. Yaraş, E., Yeniçeri, T., & Zengin, Y. (2009). Mağaza markalı ürün satın alan tüketiciler ile satın almayan tüketiciler arasında algılanan risk bakımından farklılık olup olmadığının incelenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (18), 198-217.
  50. Yüce, A. (2014). Perakendecilik Sektöründe Tüketicilerin Algıladıkları Riskler: Süpermarketlerde Bir Uygulama. Ekev Akademi Dergisi, 58(58), 230-250.