Vol. 6 No. 3 (2021): Turkish Journal of Marketing
Articles

Online retail therapy: Examination of retail therapy levels according to consumers' moods

PDF (Türkçe)
  • Seval Taşer Polat,
  • Kumru Uyar
Seval Taşer Polat
Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye
Kumru Uyar
Assoc. Prof. Dr., Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30685/tujom.v6i3.137

Published 12/24/2021

How to Cite

Taşer Polat, S., & Uyar, K. (2021). Online retail therapy: Examination of retail therapy levels according to consumers’ moods. Turkish Journal of Marketing, 6(3), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.30685/tujom.v6i3.137

Copyright (c) 2021 Seval Taşer Polat- Kumru Uyar

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of consumers' positive and negative moods on online retail therapy. Research data were collected from online shopping consumers between April 7-21, 2021. Four hundred sixty-six usable data were obtained. In the study, it was concluded that positive emotions affect online retail therapy. When the dimensions of the online retail therapy scale were examined, it was seen that positive mood had a positive effect on therapeutic shopping motivations, positive emotion reinforcement and therapeutic shopping outcome variables. However, it was concluded that positive emotions did not significantly affect the decreased negative mood. Therefore, it was supposed that negative attitudes also impact online retail therapy. When the sub-dimensions of the therapy scale in retail were examined, it was seen that negative emotional states had no impact on therapeutic shopping motivations and positive emotion reinforcement. On the other hand, it was concluded that it affected harmful mood reduction and therapeutic shopping motivations. According to the findings obtained from the analysis, comments on the effect of consumers' emotional states on the retail therapy level were presented, and the research limitations were stated.

PDF (Türkçe)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Andrade, E.B. (2005). Behavioural consequences of affect: combining evaluative and regulatory mechanisms, Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (12), 355-362.
  2. Atalay, A., ve Meloy, M. G. (2011). Retail Therapy: A Strategic Effort to Improve Mood. Psychology & Marketing, 28 (6), 638-660.
  3. Babin, B. J., Griffin, M., Borges, A., ve Boles, J. S. (2013). Negative emotions, value and relationships: Differences between women and men. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Service, 20 (5), 471-478.
  4. Bui, M., ve Kemp, E. (2013). E-tail emotion regulation: examining online hedonic product purchases. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 41 (2), 155-170.
  5. Durmuş, B., Yurtkoru, E., ve Çinko, M. (2013). "Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS'le Veri Analizi". İstanbul: Beta.
  6. Edwards, E. (1993). Development of a new scale for measuring compulsive buying behaviour. Financial Counseling and Planning , 67-84.
  7. Gardner, M., ve Rook, D. (1998). Effects of impulse purchases on consumers' affective states. Advances in Consumer Research. 15, 127-130.
  8. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., ve Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Education Limited.
  9. Kacen, J. (1998). Retail therapy: Consumers’ shopping cures for negative moods. Advances in consumer research, 25 (1), 75-87.
  10. Kang, M., ve Johnson, K. K. (2011). Retail Therapy: Scale Development. Clothing & Textiles, 29 (1), 3-19.
  11. Ko, E., Chun, E., Song, S., ve Mattila, P. (2015). Exploring SNS as a consumer tool for retail therapy: explicating semantic networks of “shopping makes me happy (unhappy)” as a new product development method. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 25 (1), 37-48.
  12. Kumar, K. S., ve Sultana, M. (2017). Enhancing Customer Experience Through Retail Therapy. International Journal of Commerce and Managerial Science Research, 1 (1), 16-19.
  13. Laros, F., ve Steenkamp, J. (2005). Emotion in consumer behaviour: a hierarchical approach. Journal of Business Research , 1437-1445.
  14. Lee, J., ve Lee, Y. (2019). Does online shopping make consumers feel better? Exploring online retail therapy effects on consumers’ attitudes towards online shopping malls. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics .
  15. Lee, J., ve Lee, Y. (2019). Does online shopping make consumers feel better? Exploring online retail therapy effects on consumers’ attitudes towards online shopping malls. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics .31 (2) , 464-479.
  16. Lee, L. (2015). The Emotional Shopper: Assessing the Effectiveness of Retail Therapy. NowPress.Singapore.
  17. Nayebzadeh, S. ve Jalaly, M.(2014). Investigating Iranian female Muslim consumer impulse buying behaviour used as a form of retail therapy.Journal of Islamic Marketing, 5 (2), 302-320.
  18. Noh, M., ve Rakib ul Hasan, H. M. (2017). Moderating effect of personality traits on relationships between retail therapy, compulsive buying, and hoarding for fashion products. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 8 (3), 180-192.
  19. Ortony, A. (1990). What's basic about basic emotions? Psychological review, 97 (3), 315.
  20. Pereira, B., ve Rick, S. (2011). Why Retail Therapy Works: It Is Choice, Not Acquisition, That Primarily Alleviates Sadness. Association For Consumer Research , 738.
  21. Rick, S., Pereira, B., ve Burson, K. (2014). The benefits of retail therapy: Making purchase decisions reduces residual sadness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (3), 373-380.
  22. Son, J., ve Chang, H. J. (2016). Retail Therapy: What Makes You Feel Relieved and Happy. International Textile and Apparel Association (ITAA) Annual Conference Proceedings.73. Iowa State University Digital Press.
  23. Trampe, D., ve Stapel, D. A. (2011). Retail Therapy Or Rose-Tinted Glasses? the Effect of Mood on Impulse Buying. Association For Consumer Research, 38.
  24. Tunjungsari, ,. H. (2011). Retail Therapy : Do Foreign Brands Give More Satisfaction Than Local Brands?http://repository.untar.ac.id/id/eprint/273
  25. TÜBİSAD Ekonominin Dönüştürücü Gücü: E-Ticaret Etki Analizi 2020 Raporu, https://www.tubisad.org.tr/tr/images/pdf/tubisad-e-commerce_impact_assessmentlaunch presentation.pdf
  26. Uyar,K., (2019). Perakende Terapi.Business &&Manegeent Studies: An International Journal,7(1),496-513.
  27. Watson,D., ve Clark,A.C., (1988).Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: the PANAS Scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54 (6), 1063-1070.