A CONCEPTUAL VIEW ON DIDEROT EFFECT AND ZEIGARNIK EFFECT IN CONSUMPTION
PDF (Turkish)

Keywords

Diderot Effect
Zeigarnik Effect
Consumption

How to Cite

A CONCEPTUAL VIEW ON DIDEROT EFFECT AND ZEIGARNIK EFFECT IN CONSUMPTION. (2019). Turkish Journal of Marketing, 4(1), 42-61. https://doi.org/10.30685/tujom.v4i1.39

Abstract

As soon as consumption became apart from its functional value and gained different meta values through the discourses of media and culture mediators, sociological and psychological reasons behind consumption phenomenon has become more questionable. The point of view indicating that consumption is just the function of income collapsed and the point of view indicating that irrational different factors can be determinant in consumption phenomenon has become dominant. In the explanation of this irrational condition in consumption, the interdisciplinary approach where the concepts in sociology and psychology literature are used can be instructive. In this work, the place of Diderot effect and Zeigarnik effect thought to be psychological reasons behind irrational consumption activities in consumption phenomenon and marketing discipline was examined. As a result of literature review made within the study, it was determined that departure products and the products bought as a result of symbolic values could be effective in forming new Diderot unities. In addition,it was determined that the advertisements prepared by using Zeigarnik effect and provided incomplete receive audiences? attention more, arouse audiences? interest, and stick in audiences? mind.

PDF (Turkish)

References

Baloğlu, F. (1997), Tüketim Eğilimi ve Tüketimi Etkileyen Unsurlar. Doktora tezi, İstanbul.

Batı, U. (2015), Tüketici Davranışları. Tüketim Kültürü, Psikolojisi ve Sosyolojisi Üzerine Şeytanın Notları. İstanbul: Alfa Basım Yayım.

Baudrillard, J. (2015), Tüketim Toplumu. Söylenceleri/Yapıları. (Çev. A. Şenel). İstanbul: Ayrıntı.

Belk, R. W. (1988), ?Possessions and the Extended Self?, Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139-168.

Bigman, A. (2014), Gestalt Principles and the Psychology Design. Erişim Tarihi: 04.03.2019, https://99designs.com.sg/blog/tips/gestalt-principles-psychology-design/

Bourdieu, P. (1984), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge and Kegan.

Brown, J. D., Campbell, K, and L. Fischer (1986), ?American Adolescents and Music Videos: Why Do They Watch??, Gazette, 37, 19-32.

Dale, T. (2004), ?Writing Effective Ad Headlines-the Zeigarnik Effect. Attracting Customers to Your Message Among the Vast Clutter of Daily Commercial Enticements?, New Mexico Business Journal, February 2004.

Davis, T. and G. Gregory (2003), Creating Diderot Unities-Quest for Possible Selves??, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 20 (1), 44-54.

Diderot, D. (1769), ?Regrets for My Old Dressing Gown, or a Warning to Those Who Have More Taste Than Fortune?, Oeuvres Complètes, 4, Paris, Garnier Fréres, 1875.

Douglas, M. (1982), ?The Effects of Modernization of Religious Change?, Daedalus, 111 (1).

Elliott, R. (1994), ?Addictive Consumption: Function and Fragmentation in Postmodernity?, Journal of Consumer Policy, 17, 159-179.

Englis, B. G. and M. R. Solomon (1996), ?Using Concumption Constellations to Develop Integrated Communications Strategies?, Journal of Business Research, 37, 183-191.

Englis, B. G., Solomon, M. R. and A. Olofsson (1993), ?Consumption Imagery in Music Television: A Bi-Cultural Perspective?, Journal of Advertising, 22, 21-34.

Englis, B. G. (1990), ?Music Television and Its Influences on Consumers, Consumer Culture, and the Transmission of Consumption Messages?, Advances in Consumer Research, 18, 111-114.

Featherstone, M. (2013), Postmodernizm ve Tüketim Kültürü. (Çev. M. Küçük). İstanbul: Ayrıntı.

Hammadi, A. and F. K. Qureishi (2013), ?Relationship Between the Zeigarnik Effect and Consumer Attention in Advertisement?, World Journal of Social Sciences, 3 (4), 131-143.

Heimbach, J. T. and J. Jacoby (1972), ?The Zeigarnik Effect in Advertising?, Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research, 746-758.

Hogg, M. K. (1998), ?Anti-Constellations: Exploring the Impact of Negation on Consumption?, Journal of Marketing Management, 14, 133-158.

Kaplan, E. A. (1987), Rocking Around the Clock: Music Television, Postmodernism, and Consumer Culture. New York: Methuen.

Kıray, M.B. (2005), Tüketim Normları Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma. İstanbul: Bağlam.

Kleine, S. S., Kleine, R. E. and C. T. Allen (1995), ?How is a Possession ?Me? or ?Not Me??: Characterizing Types and an Antecedent of Material Possession Attachment?, Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 327-343.

Köse, H. (2010), Medya ve Tüketim Sosyolojisi. Ankara: Ayraç Kitapevi.

Madrigal, R. and C. Bee (2005), ?Suspense as an Experience of Mixed Emotions: Feelings of Hope and Fear While Watching Suspenseful Commelcials?, Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 561-567.

Markus, H. And P. Nurius (1986), ?Possible Selves?, American Psychologist, 41 (9), 954-969.

McCracken, G. (1988), Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to the Symbolic Character of Consumer Goods and Activities. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Rose, G. (1978), The Melancholy Science: An Introduction to the Thought of Theodor W. Adorno. Londra: Macmillan.

Sartre, J. P. (1998), Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. London: Routledge.

Schiffman, N. and S. Greist-Bousquet (1992), ?The Effect of Task Interruption and Closure on Perceived Duration?, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30 (1), 9-11.

Shove, E.and A. Warde (1998), Inconspicuous Consumption: The Sociology of Consumption and the Environment. Department of Sociology, Lancester University, http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/soc001aw.html

Slater, D. (1997), Consumer Culture and Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Solomon, M. R. And H. Assael (1987), The Forest or the Trees?: A Gestalt Approach to Symbolic Consumption, in Marketing and Semiotics: New Directions in the Study of Signs for Sale, Jean Umiker-Sebeok, ed., Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Stern, H. (1962), ?The Significance of Impulse Buying Today?, Journal of Marketing, 26 (2), 59-62.

Thompson, C. J. and E.C. Hirschman (1995), ?Understanding the Socialized Body: A Poststructuralist Analysis of Consumers? Self-Conceptions, Body Images, and Self Care Practices?, Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (September), 139-153.

Wattanasuwan, K. (2005), ?The Self and Symbolic Consumption?, Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, Mar 2005.

Wertheimer, M. (1912), ?Experimentelle Studien über Das Sehen von Bewegung. Experimental Studies on Motion Vision?, Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 61 (1), 161-265.

Veblen, T. (1899), Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions. New York: Macmillan.

Wilk, R. R. (1996), ?A Critique of Desire: Distaste and Dislike in Consumer Behavior?, Consumption Markets & Culture, 1 (2), 175-196.

Wilk, R. R. (1995), Learning Distaste: The Social Importance of Not-Wanting. Learning to Consume, Lund University.

Wilk, R. R. (1994), ?I Hate Pizza: Distaste and Dislike in the Consuming Lives of Belizeans?, American Antropological Association Meeting, Atlanta.

Zeigarnik, B. (1927), ?On Finished and Unfinished Tasks- Über Das Behalten von Erledigten und Unerledigten Handlungen?, Psychologische Forschung, 9.

In TUJOM- Turkish Journal of Marketing, the copyrights of the articles belong to the Authors.

TUJOM- Turkish Journal of Marketing protects its articles under the Creative Commons (cc by-nc-nd 4.0) license. Authors are considered to have accepted this.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.